Hi Dewey
@DeweyRooter
Thanks for the kind compliment! Out of curiosity, I looked up 'Chicago Apache' in the database and found it has already been a "Plant of the day" back in 1985. It was registered in 1981, versus 1977 for 'Chicago Ruby'. Both won HM awards. Apache has a fuller form and is noticeably more "ruffled", as good as it got back then. (That was about to change with the introduction of the then-sensationally ruffled 'Dance Ballerina Dance' registered by Virginia Peck in 1976). Apache is in the parentage of an impressive 86 child plants and is grown by 81 NGA members still! The numbers are lower for 'Chicago Ruby', 32 child plants, 12 members have it.
I said Marsh specialized in tetraploids. That is not quite right. He put a lot of emphasis on tets and was one of the first major tetraploid hybridizers. He also maintained a parallel diploid hybridizing program which was also popular. His tets were named with the prefix "Chicago". The diploids were given the prefix "Prairie". Probably the best known today is 'Prairie Blue Eyes' (1970), still bring grown by 77 members. It only has 74 registered child plants but it has many more descendants in later generations. Its "blue eye" is pallid compared to today's versions, but it still has its own charm.
These 52 years of progress have slowly produced incremental improvements and new variations that now add up to an explosion of choices that were not even imagined back then. I'm not old or anything 😉 but I bought my first collection of 22 daylilies from a local Iowa garden in 1976. 'Chicago Ruby' was not even registered then. When it was introduced, it was as unaffordable to me as the $250 introductions of today. Actually I could buy a few now. Back then I was on a newlywed budget. It's lovely having the luxury of doing that when I find a special one. In general , I prefer waiting 3-5 years to see which ones are found to be good performers. The database and forums here on NGA are wonderful assets for helping sift through the thousands!
My name. Yes, it's confusing even to me. I thought there were too many Pats already in the daylily forums but it's just odd trying to go by my middle name. So I think I'll drop it.
Pat