Hi Mary,
yes, the HDR is the one that shows more in the shadows....it's not as good as I'd like, since the
breeze moved the stem in the back, so you see the double image.
But at least the spider and flower its on were not moving, so it worked as an HDR (more or less).
Ideally, the subject should be absolutely still, and have the camera on a tripod. But I always try it anyway
handheld, and am able to get many good images (imho).
re: PseudoHDR.....I agree...I thought it was best, too. Since it was based on one image, it doesn't have
the double image artifact problem.
re: Photoshop.....a friend of mine used it to create a PseudoHDR that looked very good, but I don't have PS.
Also, there are 2 schools of thought (always).....some are purists who refuse to use it. But I've seen
some very good images that would not have been possible without HDR, or at least a lot of PS work.
Those who use HDR, i.e. at least 3 images, usually +/- 2ev/f-stops plus one "right-on" will say it still
is best to get the range of tones, whereas one image doesn't have all the data.
Some shoot only RAW (not sure which flavor...there are several).....I've tried a single RAW image for
creating the PseudoHDR (I think that's the correct term, but may not be standard),
but didn't think it was as good, imho, as the multi-image HDR.
It's personal choice, and everyone is entitled to do what they like. I don't ever (well, hardly ever) tell someone they HAVE to
do this or NOT do that. Experiment, and do what pleases YOU.
I don't enter photo contests because I don't want to try to please the judges. I love this forum where you can share your
pics with so many & learn as much as you want.
Hope you go out and have fun taking pics today.
Cal
ps-
ALWAYS take off the lens cap, buckle your seat-belt, have fun.
NEVER use your camera to drive a nail into a board, or put wasabe up your nose.