A badge for deer is a good idea.
Whether we love and welcome the deer or spend countless hours and dollars to keep them away, just the word 'Deer' would be enough to get folks to buy the badge.
Bonehead said: At some point it was also discussed keeping all the animals together and remove the 'keeper of...' or 'lover of...' and just let folks use the animals however they like.
I agree that having 'keeper of...' or 'lover of' is a bit offputting. I don't love cats but when a local cat decides to work in my yard, I welcome it...I may not love it or even feed it, but having just the word 'cat' would be enough to get folks to buy a badge.
There are some inconsistencies in the naming of badges...
'Keeper of' applies to Koi and poultry but the goats, horses, and sheep have 'Keeps'...rather than 'Keeper of'. We have 'Raises Cows' (and shouldn't that be cattle rather than cows?) but we have 'Rabbit Keeper'. And then there are 'Mules', just plain mules with no keeper of or keeps or raises. Maybe mules are too stubborn to have a qualifier?
Just my opinion, but I think it would be nice to look down the list of available badges and see the name of the animal in question. How we feel personally - whether we love or hate or suffer or keep/keeper of, or raise...how we feel about the animal may differ but the badge will acknowledge that we have some interest or some feeling (even if it is shooting daggers at deer who eat all the daylilies
).
Oh, and poultry includes...chickens, ducks, turkeys, geese, etc. Why not a badge for each? Heck, I just got chickens the other day and was looking for a chicken badge - had to settle for a poultry badge.