This plant appears to be a plain rubrotinctum. Perhaps it was a revert. I suggest that this image be moved to the xRubrotinctum entry.

@sedumzz

I'm not doubting your comment but I am curious for my own educational purposes, what feature(s), or lack thereof, are you comparing?

purpleinopp said: I'm not doubting your comment but I am curious for my own educational purposes, what feature(s), or lack thereof, are you comparing?

Yes it's reverted.
In this case it's not streaked with pink like it should be. Aurora should be pale and new growth, under the conditions it looks like in this photo, should be light pastel pink with streaks, not regular green with red.

This fellow in Australia explains it well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

TYVM! OMG his garden! Way too much grass if it could be succulents instead, but aside from that - wow!! And he is saying the botanical names. I've never heard most of these words, just read 'em. It looks like there is no frost where he is. He thinks some of these cultivars are the same thing. I've been suspecting that. Watched the whole thing.

Even botanical gardens get things wrong.
Moved.