@Baja_Costero
This looks more like a baby buttons type crassula, like perforata

I would think it is perforata, though I do not know a lot about this group. A quick search of my favorite Crassulaceae site revealed a 'Pagoda Village' and an 'Ivory Pagoda' (both distinct) but not a simple 'Pagoda', at least not among the Crassulas. There may be 'Pagodas' of various kinds out there, given the body architecture of the succulents in this group, and it would not surprise me if some are species. I hope this helps.

That looks like a crassula perforata ... string of buttons.


The pagodas have a tighter look to them, even when they are stretching for more light. Well, that is my experience anyway.

@Joy forgot to @ , sorry

Anyways: Aeonium2003 says:
I think a lot of the pagodas in the database are messed up. IMO, all the pagodas which are not "registered" cultivars should be deleted. Crassula 'Pagoda' is not a legitimate cultivar. "Pagoda" is thrown around too much with stacked crassulas.

Perforata seems like the best ID to me. The C. 'Green Pagoda' does not have the waxy coating on the leaves, or red edges. It also does not show the distinct markings.

I don't know how he can say 'Pagoda' is not a legitimate cultivar when there is no official registry of cultivars for this genus, but I agree the word is thrown around way too much with this group.

If it's wrong please feel free to move or delete it. I took the photo in a local nursery. The tag it had must have been wrong.