dirtdorphins said:Well said Asa
Robin, I think your original thread in the plant database forum has disappeared altogether now, so it looks like whatever discussion is here now anyway, with the lovers of buggycritterythingies
Yes, I see what you mean--that thread is gone now.
Dirt, those are gorgeous photos!
I agree that we could not (and would not want to) recreate the plant database into an entomology website, but on the other hand I disagree that the resource we could create here exists elsewhere. Eg, if you look up bugs or lepidoptera species on websites dedicated to those, you find--well--pictures focused on bugs and lepidoptera!
I think what we could do here is unique and does *not* seek to duplicate resources that other sites are better equipped to provide. Following on Asa's excellent point about the interrelatedness of plants and bugs/pollinators, the database we could create could highlight that--eg, as Asa said, the parent (?) roses page could provide links to aphids and rose sawfly larvae, and the milkweed database to Monarchs and Queens, depending on the species. And so on. Bugs and pollinators are a fact of life for gardeners and not an unnecessary interloper whose subject matter only belongs properly on someone else's site.
So, I really like the idea of finding a way to provide links in the plant database to pollinators and other bugs that could serve as an extremely useful tool *for gardeners* (not for entomologists or lepidopterists).
In terms of thumbnails and which photo appears as the main thumbnail, I have a hard time getting worked up over that.
I understand it's important to many people, but as Beverly mentioned, when I *open* a plant, I can scroll through all of the photos, and give thumbs to the ones I want to. I actually like the idea of rotating the thumbnails--maybe that would relieve some of the pressure to have only the most perfect and pure specimens as main thumbnails.