Viewing post #1611105 by floota

You are viewing a single post made by floota in the thread called Wedding Band in historical context.
Image
Dec 31, 2017 8:17 AM CST
Name: Julie C
Roanoke, VA (Zone 7a)
Daylilies Garden Photography Region: Virginia Photo Contest Winner: 2015 Heucheras Cat Lover
Hummingbirder Clematis Lilies Birds Garden Art Butterflies
You realize,I'm sure, that this was hybridized long before we even knew about rust.and probably before rust even existed in daylilies. It won the Stout YEARS ago, and a big part of that was the edge.It looks quite insignificant by today's standards but for the time
It was quite revolutionary . Edges of today wouldn't be what they are today w/o Pat Stamiles pioneering in this area. I grew this plant back in the day( also had a complete SSM collection back then ) and it was a good garden plant, although a bit short. We can hopefully appreciate the historical significance w/o judging it and other historic daylilies too harshly by today's standards. That's why our gardens evolve. Almost all of the 1100 plants that grew here 25 years ago have long since been moved out and replaced many times over. It's always interesting to visit hybridizers home gardens and talk to them. Those who have been at it for a long time generally no longer grow most of their their early introductions either, and I've heard some of them mention certain ones that they say they'd never introduce today or certain ones they don't
Iike now as their tastes have changed. Sorry didn't mean to write a dissertation.

« Return to the thread "Wedding Band in historical context"
« Return to Comment concerning Daylily (Hemerocallis 'Wedding Band')
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by Murky and is called "Hibiscus"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.