Whatever images that may now be misfiled under the type subspecies (despite being the other one as it is currently described) will have to stay there because I am not enough of an expert to distinguish one from the other by sight, at least not reliably. In my experience subsp. runyonii seems to be more common than the type subspecies in cultivation.
I have left just this comment for subsp. runyonii explaining what I think here. I'm happy to walk away from this issue, no need for further intervention.
https://garden.org/thread/post...
As always I welcome correction and clarification, and I will revise my comments to reflect whatever I learn in the process.
