Viewing post #504633 by dave

Bonehead said:Hmm. I suppose that makes some sense, but then what's the point? Wouldn't that penalize any company which has not yet been recommended - a no-vote could easily be construed as a negative.

The feature isn't intended as a warning against certain companies at all. Rather, it's specifically to reward a company for being recommended by the members. If a company isn't listed, it doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't a good company, only that they aren't specifically recommended by any ATP members.