Viewing post #796262 by RoseBlush1

You are viewing a single post made by RoseBlush1 in the thread called An offensive word in the db.
Image
Feb 22, 2015 10:45 PM CST
Name: Lyn
Weaverville, California (Zone 8a)
Celebrating Gardening: 2015 Garden Sages Garden Ideas: Level 1
Plants were introduced to commerce over time. Often the names they were given are now considered offensive, but at the time they were introduced, the names were acceptable.

For example there are two roses named 'Black Boy'. One was introduced in 1918 and the other one was introduced in 1958. Another rose named 'Nigger Boy' was introduced in 1931

No one would even think of introducing a rose by those names today.

I think most gardeners understand this concept and would not take offense to the usage of the name that is considered to be offensive in current times in a database.

Smiles,
Lyn
I'd rather weed than dust ... the weeds stay gone longer.

« Return to the thread "An offensive word in the db"
« Return to Site Talk forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by Lucius93 and is called "Pollination"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.