Bonehead said:... I don't know anyone who considers themselves to have mastered gardening (is that even possible??)
I know I'm quoting selectively and out of context, but I wanted to applaud that phrase enthusiastically.
I thought some more about what bothered me so much, and I'm even more sure now that "It's me, it's not the MG programs".
Their
goal is to give advice to people who mostly do NOT want to research and debate the ninety-eleven possible different points of view and opinions that exist on any given real-world issue that involves people and their varying situations.
That's a worthy goal, and
wanting a SIMPLE answer is understandable, even if I happen to think that few simple answers capture all the relevant variables.
I would like to convince all of them that nature is seldom simple, and they should relish the complexities as much as I do.
But they are the smart ones if they answer "FFFPPPTTT, I don't WANT a three-page debate, I WANT a simple answer that's fairly likely to be at least somewhat helpful".
At least I happened to say the right thing:
I would have a hard time giving simple answers (that seem dogmatic and incomplete to me).
In other words, I would have a hard time giving normal home gardeners USEFUL answers!
I'm beginning to think that I shouldn't question whether an MG program is right for me ... I should hope that my local MG program is smart enough to reject me, or at least let me do volunteer time doing tasks that won't drive normal people asking normal questions right straight out of their minds!
People keep telling me that I'm too detail-oriented, but that's kind of incomprehensible to me. It would be like being too healthy, too rich, or having too much compost.