I sort of like the yellow and green thing going on, there. Sometimes I prefer to see grass growing in a bed rather than mulch. It makes the rose seem to inhabit a more natural place. It's hard to get roses to look good in big beds, I think. Many prominent rose gardens either use mulch or huge divisions of weeding staff to kill anything that grows between roses. It's what is expected. But in my opinion, when the bed is more than about one rose deep, it's a very unusual rose that can keep me from staring at the mulch and wishing there were more plants mixed in. Roses barely hold their own in the garden when they are blooming, and the rest of the year they can be negligible or even ugly plants. Less true of floribundas. I'm still trying to figure out how to mix narcissus, tulips, daylilies, iris, dianthus, veronica, kniphofia, nepeta, lavender, and salvia in with my roses. Having some success.
I am quite sure that early watering this year and something like 120 lbs of Mills Magic has made a difference in the garden. Only three or four roses are far enough along to know this for sure, because most are still recovering from cold weather, but Baronne Prevost has grown maybe a foot in every direction already this spring, which is the only change in dimension that rose has had in its three year tenure here. He got less than a pound of that, so I'm hoping the other roses follow suit.
Sue, what lovely photos of your mother's garden! I worried for some time about whether I should get Golden Celebration for my garden and where to put it. After looking at your photos I was glad I did, and it didn't really matter where, so long as it was happy with the placement. The way my garden works, I'm hoping for good photos of GS in two or three years...