Viewing post #2355017 by ShawnSteve

You are viewing a single post made by ShawnSteve in the thread called Bare Root vs Grafted David Austins.
Image
Sep 25, 2020 6:24 PM CST
Name: Shawn S.
Hampton, Virginia (Zone 8b)
Annuals Butterflies Dahlias Irises Morning Glories Orchids
Peonies Region: United States of America Zinnias
The question you posed, just may depend on if Lady E H, by Austin's performs poorly, or not, on own roots.
(I can't say, as I never grew it, although I bet the answer can be searched for, & found.)

In your relatively mild winter climate, there really may not be any need, for grafted. Unless on its' own roots, results in poor performance.
While some people just don't really care for the "look", of the graft union on a rose.
The size, I noticed for Lady EH, being 4 x 4 ft. at the website. Doesn't seems all that large, if that is possibly a kind of hint. Perhaps, if they only offer it grafted, that may be another clue.
As some from Austin's are offered both grafted, & own root, being of comparable size, when ordered either way.

« Return to the thread "Bare Root vs Grafted David Austins"
« Return to Roses forum
« Return to the Garden.org homepage

Member Login:

( No account? Join now! )

Today's site banner is by Newyorkrita and is called "Rose Francois Rabelais"

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.